Bodily tides near the 1:1 spin-orbit resonance. Correction to Goldreich's dynamical model
James G. Williams, Michael Efroimsky

TL;DR
This paper corrects and extends Goldreich's model of bodily tides near the 1:1 spin-orbit resonance, addressing the unphysical assumptions in the MacDonald torque approach and analyzing the effects of triaxiality and dissipation on spin evolution.
Contribution
It introduces necessary modifications to the MacDonald torque model for accurate spin-orbit coupling near resonance, incorporating effects of triaxiality and dissipation.
Findings
Corrected the MacDonald torque model for physical consistency.
Derived expressions for libration frequency, damping, and orientation.
Showed stability of pseudosynchronous spin depends on dissipation model.
Abstract
Spin-orbit coupling is often described in the "MacDonald torque" approach which has become the textbook standard. Within this method, a concise expression for the additional tidal potential, derived by MacDonald (1964; Rev. Geophys. 2, 467), is combined with an assumption that the Q factor is frequency-independent (i.e., that the geometric lag angle is constant in time). This makes the approach unphysical because MacDonald's derivation of the said formula was implicitly based on keeping the time lag frequency-independent, which is equivalent to setting Q to scale as the inverse tidal frequency. The contradiction requires the MacDonald treatment of both non-resonant and resonant rotation to be rewritten. The non-resonant case was reconsidered by Efroimsky & Williams (2009; CMDA 104, 257), in application to spin modes distant from the major commensurabilities. We continue this work by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
