Why is lead so kinky?
P. M. Goddard (1), P. D. Stevenson (1), A. Rios (1) ((1) University, of Surrey)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the cause of the kink in charge radius shifts of neutron-rich lead isotopes, emphasizing the role of neutron orbital occupation and single-particle energy positioning in Skyrme force models.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the isotope shift kink depends on neutron orbital occupation and the alignment of single-particle energies, highlighting the importance of correlations or mean-field adjustments.
Findings
Occupation of neutron 1i11/2 orbital influences isotope shift
Single-particle energy positioning affects model accuracy
Correlations or adjusted energies are necessary for accurate predictions
Abstract
We revisit the problem of the kink in the charge radius shift of neutron-rich even lead isotopes. We show that the ability of a Skyrme force to reproduce the isotope shift is determined by the occupation of the neutron 1i11/2 orbital beyond N=126 and the corresponding change it causes to deeply-bound protons orbitals with a principal quantum number of 1. Given the observed position of the single-particle energies, one must either ensure occupation is allowed through correlations, or not demand that the single-particle energies agree with experimental values at the mean-field level.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
