WASP-54b, WASP-56b and WASP-57b: Three new sub-Jupiter mass planets from SuperWASP
F. Faedi (Warwick), D. Pollacco (Warwick), S. C. C. Barros, D. Brown,, A. Collier Cameron, A. P. Doyle, R. Enoch, M. Gillon, Y. Gomez Maqueo Chew, (Warwick, Vanderbilt), G. Hebrard, M. Lendl, C. Liebig, B. Smalley, A. H. M., J. Triaud, R. G. West, P. J. Wheatley, K. A. Alsubai

TL;DR
This paper reports the discovery of three new sub-Jupiter mass exoplanets from the SuperWASP survey, analyzing their physical properties, orbital characteristics, and potential implications for planetary composition and structure.
Contribution
The study presents three newly discovered sub-Jupiter exoplanets, including detailed measurements and analysis of their orbits, sizes, and possible internal compositions, expanding knowledge of such planets.
Findings
WASP-54b is a bloated planet with a slightly eccentric orbit.
WASP-56b and WASP-57b have high densities suggesting large heavy-element cores.
Further observations are needed to confirm orbital eccentricity and internal composition.
Abstract
We present three newly discovered sub-Jupiter mass planets from the SuperWASP survey: WASP-54b is a heavily bloated planet of mass 0.636 \mj and radius 1.653 \rj. It orbits a F9 star, evolving off the main sequence, every 3.69 days. Our MCMC fit of the system yields a slightly eccentric orbit () for WASP-54b. We investigated further the veracity of our detection of the eccentric orbit for WASP-54b, and we find that it could be real. However, given the brightness of WASP-54 V=10.42 magnitudes, we encourage observations of a secondary eclipse to draw robust conclusions on both the orbital eccentricity and the thermal structure of the planet. WASP-56b and WASP-57b have masses of 0.571 \mj and \mj, respectively; and radii of \rj for WASP-56b and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
