Neutrino masses and cosmological parameters from a Euclid-like survey: Markov Chain Monte Carlo forecasts including theoretical errors
Benjamin Audren, Julien Lesgourgues, Simeon Bird, Martin G. Haehnelt,, Matteo Viel

TL;DR
This study forecasts the precision of cosmological parameters and neutrino mass measurements from future Euclid-like surveys using MCMC, accounting for theoretical uncertainties in non-linear galaxy power spectrum modeling.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive MCMC forecast method that incorporates two types of theoretical errors, improving predictions for neutrino mass detection in future cosmological surveys.
Findings
Future Euclid-like surveys can measure neutrino mass with errors around 25-32 meV.
Including non-linear scales can improve neutrino mass constraints if theoretical errors are small.
Residual modeling errors significantly impact the sensitivity to neutrino mass measurements.
Abstract
We present forecasts for the accuracy of determining the parameters of a minimal cosmological model and the total neutrino mass based on combined mock data for a future Euclid-like galaxy survey and Planck. We consider two different galaxy surveys: a spectroscopic redshift survey and a cosmic shear survey. We make use of the Monte Carlo Markov Chains (MCMC) technique and assume two sets of theoretical errors. The first error is meant to account for uncertainties in the modelling of the effect of neutrinos on the non-linear galaxy power spectrum and we assume this error to be fully correlated in Fourier space. The second error is meant to parametrize the overall residual uncertainties in modelling the non-linear galaxy power spectrum at small scales, and is conservatively assumed to be uncorrelated and to increase with the ratio of a given scale to the scale of non-linearity. It hence…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
