The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: Final data release and cosmological results
David Parkinson, Signe Riemer-S{\o}rensen, Chris Blake, Gregory B., Poole, Tamara M. Davis, Sarah Brough, Matthew Colless, Carlos Contreras,, Warrick Couch, Scott Croom, Darren Croton, Michael J. Drinkwater, Karl, Forster, David Gilbank, Mike Gladders, Karl Glazebrook

TL;DR
This paper reports the final cosmological results from the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey, analyzing galaxy power spectra across multiple redshifts, assessing theoretical models, and confirming consistency with the LambdaCDM cosmology when combined with other datasets.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive analysis of the WiggleZ survey data, testing various power spectrum models, and provides publicly available tools and data for further cosmological research.
Findings
Consistent with LambdaCDM when combined with CMB data.
Measured Omega_m = 0.29 +/- 0.016 and sigma_8 = 0.825 +/- 0.017.
No evidence for deviations in extension parameters from standard cosmology.
Abstract
This paper presents cosmological results from the final data release of the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey. We perform full analyses of different cosmological models using the WiggleZ power spectra measured at z=0.22, 0.41, 0.60, and 0.78, combined with other cosmological datasets. The limiting factor in this analysis is the theoretical modelling of the galaxy power spectrum, including non-linearities, galaxy bias, and redshift-space distortions. In this paper we assess several different methods for modelling the theoretical power spectrum, testing them against the Gigaparsec WiggleZ simulations (GiggleZ). We fit for a base set of 6 cosmological parameters, {Omega_b h^2, Omega_CDM h^2, H_0, tau, A_s, n_s}, and 5 supplementary parameters {n_run, r, w, Omega_k, sum m_nu}. In combination with the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), our results are consistent with the LambdaCDM concordance…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
