Equality of Two Definitions for Transverse Momentum Dependent Parton Distribution Functions
John C. Collins, Ted C. Rogers

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that two recent approaches to TMD-factorization are fundamentally equivalent, differing only in their renormalization scheme definitions, clarifying the theoretical understanding of transverse momentum dependent parton distribution functions.
Contribution
It shows the equivalence of two prominent TMD-factorization formalisms, resolving apparent differences and unifying the theoretical framework.
Findings
The two approaches are mathematically equivalent.
Differences are due to renormalization scheme definitions.
Clarifies the theoretical basis of TMD PDFs.
Abstract
We compare recent, seemingly different, approaches to TMD-factorization (due to Echevarria, Idilbi, and Scimemi and to Collins), and show that they are the same, apart from an apparent difference in their definition of the \MSbar{} renormalization scheme.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
