The faster the narrower: characteristic bulk velocities and jet opening angles of Gamma Ray Bursts
G. Ghirlanda (1), G. Ghisellini (1), R. Salvaterra (2), L. Nava (3),, D. Burlon (4), G. Tagliaferri (1), S. Campana (1), P. D'Avanzo (1), A., Melandri (1) ((1) INAF-Osservatorio Brera, (2) INAF-IASF Milano, (3) APC -, Paris, (4) Sydney Institute for Astronomy)

TL;DR
This study uses population synthesis to explore the distributions of jet opening angles and Lorentz factors in Gamma Ray Bursts, revealing a correlation where faster bursts tend to have narrower jets, and predicts observational signatures.
Contribution
It demonstrates that Gamma Ray Burst parameters are best modeled with log-normal distributions and an intrinsic relation between their peak values, improving understanding of their energetics.
Findings
Gamma_0 and theta_jet follow log-normal distributions.
An intrinsic relation theta_jet^2.5 * Gamma_0 = const is supported.
Approximately 6% of bursts may lack observable jet breaks.
Abstract
The jet opening angle theta_jet and the bulk Lorentz factor Gamma_0 are crucial parameters for the computation of the energetics of Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs). From the ~30 GRBs with measured theta_jet or Gamma_0 it is known that: (i) the real energetic E_gamma, obtained by correcting the isotropic equivalent energy E_iso for the collimation factor ~theta_jet^2, is clustered around 10^50-10^51 erg and it is correlated with the peak energy E_p of the prompt emission and (ii) the comoving frame E'_p and E'_gamma are clustered around typical values. Current estimates of Gamma_0 and theta_jet are based on incomplete data samples and their observed distributions could be subject to biases. Through a population synthesis code we investigate whether different assumed intrinsic distributions of Gamma_0 and theta_jet can reproduce a set of observational constraints. Assuming that all bursts have…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
