Survey of Period Variations of Superhumps in SU UMa-Type Dwarf Novae. IV: The Fourth Year (2011-2012)
Taichi Kato, Franz-Josef Hambsch, Hiroyuki Maehara, Gianluca Masi, Ian, Miller, Ryo Noguchi, Chihiro Akasaka, Tomoya Aoki, Hiroshi Kobayashi, Katsura, Matsumoto, Shinichi Nakagawa, Takuma Nakazato, Takashi Nomoto, Kazuyuki, Ogura, Rikako Ono, Keisuke Taniuchi, William Stein

TL;DR
This survey analyzes period variations of superhumps in 86 SU UMa-type dwarf novae, revealing general trends, peculiar behaviors, and similarities to helium systems, advancing understanding of their accretion disk dynamics.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive observational analysis of superhump period variations across multiple dwarf nova types, including new insights into unusual outburst patterns and period behaviors.
Findings
Confirmed relation between period derivatives and orbital periods.
Identified systems with positive period derivatives despite long orbital periods.
Observed unique double outburst patterns in WZ Sge-type dwarf novae.
Abstract
Continuing the project described by Kato et al. (2009, arXiv:0905.1757), we studied 86 SU UMa-type dwarf novae. We confirmed the general trends such as the relation between period derivatives and orbital periods. There are some systems showing positive period derivatives despite the long orbital periods. We observed the 2011 outburst of the WZ Sge-type dwarf nova BW Scl, and recorded an O-C diagram similar to those of previously known WZ Sge-type dwarf novae. The WZ Sge-type dwarf nova OT J184228.1+483742 showed an unusual pattern of double outbursts composed of an outburst with early superhumps and one with ordinary superhumps. We propose an interpretation that a very small growth rate of the 3:1 resonance due to an extremely low mass-ratio led to a quenching of the superoutburst before the ordinary superhumps appeared. We studied ER UMa-type dwarf novae and found that V1159 Ori showed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
