On the physical meaning of Sachs form factors and on the violation of the dipole dependence of G_E and G_M on Q^2
M. V. Galynskii, E. A. Kuraev

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the interpretation of proton form factor measurements, proposing that the observed deviations from dipole behavior at certain Q^2 ranges are due to different spin-flip contributions in quark transitions, challenging previous assumptions.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed calculation of proton current matrix elements considering spin-flip and non-spin-flip quark contributions, explaining the violation of dipole dependence in form factors.
Findings
G_E/G_M ratio approaches 1 at certain conditions
Form factors behave as 1/Q^6 or 1/Q^4 depending on spin-flip contributions
Dipole dependence appears only when spin-flip transitions dominate at high Q^2
Abstract
We discuss questions related to the interpretation of unexpected results of measurements of the proton form factors ratio G_E/G_M in the polarization experiments done in JLab in the region of 0.5 < Q^2 < 8.5 GeV^2. For this purpose, in the case of the hard scattering mechanism we calculated (in the leading approximation) the matrix elements of the proton current J^{\pm \delta,\delta}_p for the full set of spin combinations corresponding to the number of the spin-flipped quarks, which contribute to the proton transition without spin-flip (J^{\delta,\delta}_p) and with the spin-flip (J^{-\delta,\delta}_p). This set is: (0,1), (0,3), (2,1), (2,3), where the first number in parentheses is the number of the spin-flipped quarks, which contribute to the J^{\delta,\delta}_p, and the second one is the number of the spin-flipped quarks which contribute to the J^{-\delta,\delta}_p. For the sets of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
