IC4663: the first unambiguous [WN] Wolf-Rayet central star of a planetary nebula
Brent Miszalski (SAAO/SALT), Paul A. Crowther (Sheffield), Orsola De, Marco (Macquarie), Joachim K\"oppen (Strasbourg), Anthony F. J. Moffat, (Montr\'eal/CRAQ), Agn\`es Acker (Strasbourg), Todd C. Hillwig, (Valparaiso)

TL;DR
The paper reports the discovery of IC4663 as the first unambiguous [WN] Wolf-Rayet central star of a planetary nebula, revealing a new evolutionary sequence and suggesting binary merger origins for H-deficient stars.
Contribution
It identifies the first clear [WN] central star in a planetary nebula and links it to a new evolutionary sequence, expanding understanding of H-deficient stellar evolution.
Findings
IC4663 is the first confirmed [WN] central star in a PN.
The star has an unusual helium-rich, hydrogen-deficient composition.
The discovery supports a new [WN]->O(He) evolutionary sequence.
Abstract
Several [WC]-type central stars of planetary nebulae (PNe) are known to mimic the spectroscopic appearance of massive carbon-rich or WC-type Wolf-Rayet stars. In stark contrast, no [WN]-type central stars have yet been identified as clear-cut analogues of the common nitrogen-rich or WN-type Wolf-Rayet stars. We have identified the [WN3] central star of IC4663 to be the first unambiguous example in PNe. The low luminosity nucleus and an asymptotic giant branch (AGB) halo surrounding the main nebula prove the bona-fide PN nature of IC4663. Model atmosphere analysis reveals the [WN3] star to have an exotic chemical composition of helium (95%), hydrogen (<2%), nitrogen (0.8%), neon (0.2%) and oxygen (0.05%) by mass. Such an extreme helium-dominated composition cannot be predicted by current evolutionary scenarios for hydrogen deficient [WC]-type central stars. Only with the discovery of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
