On the minimality of semigroup actions on the interval which are $C^1$-close to the identity
Katsutoshi Shinohara

TL;DR
This paper constructs a counterexample showing that semigroup actions on an interval generated by two attracting maps, which are close to the identity in the $C^1$ topology, do not necessarily have the entire interval as their minimal set.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that the known result for $C^2$-close generators does not extend to the $C^1$-topology by providing a specific counterexample.
Findings
Counterexample to minimality under $C^1$-closeness
Minimal set can be a proper subset of the interval
Contrasts with the $C^2$-case
Abstract
We consider semigroup actions on the interval generated by two attracting maps. It is known that if the generators are sufficiently -close to the identity, then the minimal set coincides with the whole interval. In this article, we give a counterexample to this result under the -topology.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
