Short vs Long and Collapsars vs. non-Collapsar: a quantitative classification of GRBs
Omer Bromberg, Ehud Nakar, Tsvi Piran, Re'em Sari

TL;DR
This paper develops a quantitative method to classify gamma-ray bursts as Collapsars or non-Collapsars based on duration and spectral data, revealing significant overlap and implications for previous classifications.
Contribution
It introduces a model for the duration distribution of Collapsars, enabling more accurate classification of GRBs and highlighting the limitations of the traditional 2-second division.
Findings
40% of Swift's short bursts are Collapsars
Duration overlap between populations is large
Non-Collapsars can have durations up to 10 seconds
Abstract
Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) are traditionally divided to long and short according to their durations (>/< 2 sec). It was generally believed that this reflects a different physical origin: Collapsars (long) and non-Collapsars (short). We have recently shown that the duration distribution of Collapsars is flat, namely independent of the duration, at short durations. Using this model for the distribution of Collapsars we determine the duration distribution of non-Collapsars and estimate the probability that a burst with a given duration (and hardness) is a Collapsar or not. We find that this probability depends strongly on the spectral window of the observing detector. While the commonly used limit of 2 sec is conservative and suitable for BATSE bursts, 40% of swift's bursts shorter than 2 sec are Collapsars and division >/<0.8 sec is more suitable for swift. We find that the duration overlap…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
