Fundamental Properties of Stars using Asteroseismology from Kepler & CoRoT and Interferometry from the CHARA Array
D. Huber, M. J. Ireland, T. R. Bedding, I. M. Brand\~ao, L. Piau, V., Maestro, T. R. White, H. Bruntt, L. Casagrande, J. Molenda-\.Zakowicz, V., Silva Aguirre, S. G. Sousa, T. Barclay, C. J. Burke, W. J. Chaplin, J., Christensen-Dalsgaard, M. S. Cunha, J. De Ridder

TL;DR
This study combines interferometry, asteroseismology, and spectroscopy to precisely determine fundamental stellar properties, testing scaling relations and models with high accuracy for various star types.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive validation of asteroseismic scaling relations using interferometric measurements across different stellar evolutionary stages.
Findings
Asteroseismic radii are accurate to within ~4% for main-sequence stars.
Effective temperature estimates agree within ~100 K with spectroscopic and photometric methods.
Observed properties of the metal-rich star HD173701 show discrepancies with models, indicating areas for improvement.
Abstract
We present results of a long-baseline interferometry campaign using the PAVO beam combiner at the CHARA Array to measure the angular sizes of five main-sequence stars, one subgiant and four red giant stars for which solar-like oscillations have been detected by either Kepler or CoRoT. By combining interferometric angular diameters, Hipparcos parallaxes, asteroseismic densities, bolometric fluxes and high-resolution spectroscopy we derive a full set of near model-independent fundamental properties for the sample. We first use these properties to test asteroseismic scaling relations for the frequency of maximum power (nu_max) and the large frequency separation (Delta_nu). We find excellent agreement within the observational uncertainties, and empirically show that simple estimates of asteroseismic radii for main-sequence stars are accurate to <~4%. We furthermore find good agreement of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
