GRB Hubble diagram and constraints on a \Lambda (t)CDM model

TL;DR

This paper tests a decaying vacuum cosmological model using an extended Hubble diagram with gamma-ray bursts up to redshift 8, finding good agreement and reduced tensions compared to the standard model.

Contribution

It extends previous cosmological tests of a mbda(t)CDM model by incorporating high-redshift gamma-ray bursts, providing new constraints and reducing tensions with supernova data.

Findings

The model fits well with GRB data up to redshift 8.

Reduced tensions between SNe Ia and GRB fits compared to standard cosmology.

Consistent with previous CMB, LSS, and BAO tests.

Abstract

In previous papers, a cosmological model with constant-rate particle creation and vacuum term decaying linearly with the Hubble parameter was shown to lead to a good concordance when tested against precise observations: the position of the first peak in the spectrum of anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background (CMB), the Hubble diagram for supernovas of type Ia (SNe Ia), the distribution of large-scale structures (LSS) and the distance to the baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO). That model has the same number of parameters as the spatially flat standard model and seems to alleviate some observational/theoretical tensions appearing in the later. In this letter we complement those tests with 109 gamma ray bursters (GRB), 59 of them with redshifts above $z=1.4$, which permits to extend the Hubble diagram to redshifts up to $z\approx 8$. For the calibration of the 50 GRBs with $z<1.4$ we use the 288 supernovas of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) project, calibrated with the MLCS2k2 fitter, less model-dependent than other samples like Union2. Our results show a good concordance with the previous tests and, again, less tensions between SNe Ia and GRB best fits as compared to the standard model.