Mid-Infrared Selection of Active Galactic Nuclei with the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer. II. Properties of WISE-Selected Active Galactic Nuclei in the NDWFS Bo\"otes Field
Roberto J. Assef, Daniel Stern, Christopher S. Kochanek, Andrew W., Blain, Mark Brodwin, Michael J. I. Brown, Emilio Donoso, Peter R. M., Eisenhardt, Buell T. Jannuzi, Thomas H. Jarrett, S. Adam Stanford, Chao-Wei, Tsai, Jingwen Wu, Lin Yan

TL;DR
This study refines mid-infrared color criteria for selecting active galactic nuclei (AGN) using WISE data, analyzing their properties and obscuration, and providing a more reliable method for identifying AGN at fainter flux levels.
Contribution
The paper introduces a modified WISE color-magnitude selection criterion for AGN that improves reliability and completeness at fainter fluxes, and analyzes the obscuration properties of these AGN.
Findings
A new color-magnitude cut finds 130+/-4 deg^-2 AGN candidates for W2<17.11 with 90% reliability.
The WISE AGN selection favors objects where the AGN dominates the bolometric luminosity.
Obscuration distribution depends on AGN luminosity, consistent with a receding torus model.
Abstract
Stern et al.(2012) presented a study of WISE selection of AGN in the 2 deg^2 COSMOS field, finding that a simple criterion W1-W2>=0.8 provides a highly reliable and complete AGN sample for W2<15.05, where the W1 and W2 passbands are centered at 3.4 and 4.6 microns, respectively. Here we extend this study using the larger 9 deg^2 NOAO Deep Wide-Field Survey Bootes field which also has considerably deeper WISE observations than the COSMOS field, and find that this simple color-cut significantly loses reliability at fainter fluxes. We define a modified selection criterion combining the W1-W2 color and the W2 magnitude to provide highly reliable or highly complete AGN samples for fainter WISE sources. In particular, we define a color-magnitude cut that finds 130+/-4 deg^-2 AGN candidates for W2<17.11 with 90% reliability. Using the extensive UV through mid-IR broad-band photometry available…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
