Biased Assimilation, Homophily and the Dynamics of Polarization
Pranav Dandekar, Ashish Goel, David Lee

TL;DR
This paper models opinion formation to explore how biased assimilation and homophily influence societal polarization, revealing that biased assimilation can lead to polarization, disagreement, or consensus, unlike traditional averaging models.
Contribution
It introduces a generalized opinion formation model incorporating biased assimilation, demonstrating its role in societal polarization beyond homophily effects.
Findings
Biased assimilation can cause polarization, disagreement, or consensus.
Homophily alone does not lead to polarization in the model.
Recommender algorithms may contribute to polarization through biased assimilation.
Abstract
Are we as a society getting more polarized, and if so, why? We try to answer this question through a model of opinion formation. Empirical studies have shown that homophily results in polarization. However, we show that DeGroot's well-known model of opinion formation based on repeated averaging can never be polarizing, even if individuals are arbitrarily homophilous. We generalize DeGroot's model to account for a phenomenon well-known in social psychology as biased assimilation: when presented with mixed or inconclusive evidence on a complex issue, individuals draw undue support for their initial position thereby arriving at a more extreme opinion. We show that in a simple model of homophilous networks, our biased opinion formation process results in either polarization, persistent disagreement or consensus depending on how biased individuals are. In other words, homophily alone,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
