Richness-mass relation self-calibration for galaxy clusters

TL;DR

This paper derives the richness-mass relation for galaxy clusters, demonstrates a method for redshift measurement using red sequence color, and forecasts how future surveys can better constrain cosmological parameters through improved scaling relation calibration.

Contribution

It provides a new calibration of the richness-mass scaling relation using weak-lensing data and models its evolution for future cosmological surveys.

Findings

Richness-mass slope found to be 0.46+-0.12 with 0.25 dex scatter

Red sequence color allows redshift measurement with Delta z<0.02

Future surveys can determine scaling parameters 10^5 times better

Abstract

This work attains a threefold objective: first, we derived the richness-mass scaling in the local Universe from data of 53 clusters with individual measurements of mass. We found a 0.46+-0.12 slope and a 0.25+-0.03 dex scatter measuring richness with a previously developed method. Second, we showed on a real sample of 250 0.06<z<0.9 clusters, most of which are at z<0.3, with spectroscopic redshift that the colour of the red sequence allows us to measure the clusters' redshift to better than Delta z=0.02. Third, we computed the predicted prior of the richness-mass scaling to forecast the capabilities of future wide-field-area surveys of galaxy clusters to constrain cosmological parameters. We computed the uncertainty and the covariance matrix of the (evolving) richness-mass scaling of a PanStarrs 1+Euclid-like survey accounting for a large suite of sources of errors. We find that the richness-mass scaling parameters, which are the input ingredients of cosmological forecasts using cluster counts, can be determined 10^5 times better than estimated in previous works that did not use weak-lensing mass estimates. The better knowledge of the scaling parameters likely has a strong impact on the relative importance of the different probes used to constrain cosmological parameters. Richness-mass scaling parameters were recovered, but only if the cluster mass function and the weak-lensing redshift-dependent selection function were accounted for in the fitting of the mass-richness scaling. This emphasizes the limitations of often adopted simplifying assumptions, such as having a mass-complete redshift-independent sample. The fitting code used for computing the predicted prior, including the treatment of the mass function and of the weak-lensing selection function, is provided in the appendix. [Abridged]