Mass-loss predictions for evolved very metal-poor massive stars
Lianne Muijres (Amsterdam), Jorick S. Vink (Armagh), A. de Koter, (Amsterdam), R. Hirschi, N. Langer, S.-C. Yoon

TL;DR
This study investigates how surface CNO enrichment in early metal-poor massive stars influences their stellar wind mass-loss rates, revealing increased but still low mass loss compared to scaled solar metallicity models.
Contribution
It introduces a Monte Carlo simulation approach to assess mass-loss rates considering CNO surface enrichment in metal-poor stars, challenging previous assumptions based on scaled solar abundances.
Findings
CNO surface enrichment increases mass-loss rates in metal-poor stars.
Mass-loss rates remain significantly lower than those predicted by scaled solar metallicity models.
Heuristic formula provided for estimating CNO-dominated wind mass loss.
Abstract
(shortened) The first couple of stellar generations may have been massive, of order 100 Msun, and to have played a dominant role in galaxy formation and the chemical enrichment of the early Universe. Some fraction of these objects may have died as pair-instability supernovae or gamma-ray bursts. The winds if these stars may have played an important role in determining these outcomes. As the winds are driven by radiation pressure on spectral lines, their strengths are expected to vary with metallicity. Until now, most mass-loss predictions for metal-poor O-type stars have assumed a scaled-down solar-abundance pattern. However, Population III evolutionary tracks show significant surface enrichment through rotational mixing of CNO-processed material, because even metal-poor stars switch to CNO-burning early on. We address the question of whether the CNO surface enhanced self-enrichment in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
