Random k-SAT and the Power of Two Choices
Will Perkins

TL;DR
This paper extends Achlioptas processes to random k-SAT, proving the existence of rules that can shift the satisfiability threshold for k >= 3, and explores implications for the hardness of random k-SAT decision problems.
Contribution
It introduces a semi-random Achlioptas-process model for k-SAT, demonstrating how specific rules can alter the satisfiability threshold for k ≥ 3, a novel extension in probabilistic combinatorics.
Findings
Existence of rules that shift the k-SAT satisfiability threshold for k ≥ 3
First proof of threshold shift in random k-SAT via Achlioptas processes
Proposed a gap decision problem to study the hardness of random k-SAT
Abstract
We study an Achlioptas-process version of the random k-SAT process: a bounded number of k-clauses are drawn uniformly at random at each step, and exactly one added to the growing formula according to a particular rule. We prove the existence of a rule that shifts the satisfiability threshold. This extends a well-studied area of probabilistic combinatorics (Achlioptas processes) to random CSP's. In particular, while a rule to delay the 2-SAT threshold was known previously, this is the first proof of a rule to shift the threshold of k-SAT for k >= 3. We then propose a gap decision problem based upon this semi-random model. The aim of the problem is to investigate the hardness of the random k-SAT decision problem, as opposed to the problem of finding an assignment or certificate of unsatisfiability. Finally, we discuss connections to the study of Achlioptas random graph processes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsConstraint Satisfaction and Optimization · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Advanced Algebra and Logic
