
TL;DR
This paper analyzes a variant of the n-in-a-row game where players claim an increasing number of points each turn, showing that the game duration is approximately proportional to n, specifically (1-o(1))n.
Contribution
It introduces and studies a new variant of the n-in-a-row game with increasing claims per turn, providing bounds on the game's duration.
Findings
Game duration is approximately (1-o(1))n turns.
The increasing claim rule significantly affects game length.
The result is somewhat unexpected given the game's structure.
Abstract
The usual -in-a-row game is a positional game in which two player alternately claim points in with the winner being the first player to claim consecutive points in a line. We consider a variant of the game, suggested by Croft, where the number of points claimed increases by 1 each turn, and so on turn a player claims points. Croft asked how long it takes to win this game. We show that, perhaps surprisingly, the time needed to win this game is .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Games · Sports Analytics and Performance · Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
