A Response Embedded Atom Method of Interatomic Potentials
L.G. Zhou, Hanchen Huang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a response embedded atom method (R-EAM) that improves interatomic potentials for metals by addressing elastic constant constraints and surface relaxation inaccuracies, aligning better with quantum mechanics at a modest computational cost.
Contribution
The R-EAM explicitly incorporates environment-dependent electron distribution, overcoming key limitations of traditional EAM potentials in modeling elastic and surface properties.
Findings
R-EAM does not impose the elastic constant constraints of EAM.
R-EAM accurately predicts surface relaxations and reconstructions.
R-EAM requires about twice the computational power of EAM.
Abstract
The embedded atom method (EAM) potentials are probably the most widely used interatomic potentials for metals and alloys. However, the EAM potentials impose three constraints on elastic constants that are inconsistent with experiments. At a more subtle (but more important) level, the EAM potentials often incorrectly describe the outward/inward relaxation of surface layers, and therefore will not reliably describe nanostructures. This Letter reports a response EAM (R-EAM) that addresses both issues. Conceptually, the electron distribution from each atom does not respond to the atoms environment within the EAM. In reality, the electron distribution from each atom depends on the atoms environment, and this dependence is explicitly incorporated in the R-EAM. Analytical derivation shows that the R-EAM potentials do not impose these three constraints on elastic constants that EAM potentials…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
