Evolutionary paths among different red galaxy types at 0.3 < z < 1.5 and the late buildup of massive E-S0's through major mergers
Mercedes Prieto, M. Carmen Eliche-Moral, Marc Balcells, David, Cristobal-Hornillos, Peter Erwin, David Abreu, Lilian Dominguez-Palmero,, Angela Hempel, Carlos Lopez-Sanjuan, Rafael Guzman, Pablo G. Perez-Gonzalez,, Guillermo Barro, Jesus Gallego, Jaime Zamorano

TL;DR
This study provides observational evidence that major mergers significantly contributed to the late formation and evolution of massive E-S0 galaxies between redshifts 0.3 and 1.5, supporting hierarchical galaxy formation models.
Contribution
It identifies a dominant evolutionary pathway from irregular disks to spheroids among massive red galaxies, confirming major mergers' role in their buildup.
Findings
Massive red regular galaxies at low z originate from irregular progenitors at higher z.
Major mergers primarily drove the migration of blue disks to the Red Sequence between z~1.5 and z~0.6.
Formation of the most massive E-S0's via gas-rich mergers has ceased since z~0.6.
Abstract
Some recent observations seem to disagree with hierarchical theories of galaxy formation about the role played by major mergers in the late buildup of massive E-S0's. We re-address this question by analysing the morphology, structural distortion level, and star formation enhancement of a sample of massive galaxies (M_* > 5 * 10^10 Msun) lying on the Red Sequence and its surroundings at 0.3 < z < 1.5. We have used an initial sample of ~1800 sources with K_s < 20.5 mag over an area ~155 arcmin^2 on the Groth Strip, combining data from the Rainbow Extragalactic Database and the GOYA Survey. Red galaxy classes that can be directly associated to intermediate stages of major mergers and to their final products have been defined. We report observational evidence of the existence of a dominant evolutionary path among massive red galaxies at 0.6<z<1.5, consisting in the conversion of irregular…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
