On the Cluster Physics of Sunyaev-Zel'dovich and X-ray Surveys III: Measurement Biases and Cosmological Evolution of Gas and Stellar Mass Fractions
N. Battaglia (CMU), J. R. Bond (CITA), C. Pfrommer (HITS), J. L., Sievers (Princeton)

TL;DR
This study uses cosmological hydrodynamical simulations to investigate measurement biases in gas mass fractions of galaxy clusters, revealing significant anisotropic distributions and biases that impact cosmological parameter estimation.
Contribution
The paper identifies and quantifies measurement biases and anisotropies in gas mass fractions from simulations, explaining discrepancies in observations and improving cosmological inference accuracy.
Findings
Gas mass fractions show 30% angular variance due to anisotropic distributions.
Biases from hydrostatic equilibrium assumptions can overestimate f_gas by 20%.
Measurement biases increase at larger radii, affecting cosmological analyses.
Abstract
Gas masses tightly correlate with the virial masses of galaxy clusters, allowing for a precise determination of cosmological parameters by means of large-scale X-ray surveys. However, according to recent Suzaku X-ray measurements, gas mass fractions, f_gas, appear to be considerably larger than the cosmic mean at the virial radius, R_200, questioning the accuracy of the cosmological parameter estimations. Here, we use a large suite of cosmological hydrodynamical simulations to study measurement biases of f_gas. We employ different variants of simulated physics, including radiative gas physics, star formation, and thermal feedback by active galactic nuclei. Computing the mass profiles in 48 angular cones, whose footprints partition the sphere, we find anisotropic gas and total mass distributions that imply an angular variance of f_gas at the level of 30%. This anisotropic distribution…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
