Microwave and radio emission of dusty star-forming galaxies: Implication for the cosmic radio background

TL;DR

This study models the radio and microwave emission from dusty star-forming galaxies to assess their contribution to the cosmic radio background, finding they cannot fully explain the ARCADE2 measurements, implying other sources or mechanisms are involved.

Contribution

The paper presents a comprehensive cosmological model of star-forming galaxies' emission from infrared to radio frequencies, including spinning dust, and evaluates their role in the cosmic radio background.

Findings

Star-forming galaxies account for 77.5% of 1.4GHz counts at 1e-4Jy.

Spinning dust contributes up to 20% of the CMB from SF galaxies.

The model cannot explain the ARCADE2 radio background measurements.

Abstract

We use the most up-to-date cosmological evolution models of star-forming (SF) galaxies and radio sources to compute the extragalactic number counts and the cosmic background from 408MHz to 12THz. The model of SF galaxies reproduces the constraints obtained by Spitzer, Herschel, and ground-based submm/mm experiments: number counts, redshift distribution of galaxies, cosmic background intensity and anisotropies. The template SEDs of this model are extrapolated to the radio adding synchrotron, free-free, and spinning dust emissions. To fix the synchrotron intensity, we use the IR/radio flux ratio, q70, and a spectral index beta=-3. For a constant q70, our model added to the AGN contribution provides a good fit to the number counts from 12THz to 408MHz and to the CIB. Spinning dust accounts for up to 20% of the cosmic microwave background produced by SF galaxies, but for less than 10% of the total background when AGN are included. The SF galaxies account for 77.5% of the number counts at 1.4GHz for a flux of 1e-4Jy. However, the model does not explain the CRB measured with the ARCADE2 experiment. Considering the case when q70 decreases strongly with redshift, this still does not explain the ARCADE2 results. It also yields to an overestimate of the low-flux number counts in the radio. Thus, we rule out a steep variation of q70 with redshift at least for z<3.5. Adding a population of faint SF galaxies at high redshift (Lir<1e11Lsun and 4<z<6), which would reproduce the ARCADE2 results, leads to predictions of the CIB much higher than what is observed, ruling out this as the explanation for the ARCADE2 results. Considering our findings and previous studies, we conclude that if the radio emission measured by ARCADE2 is astrophysical in origin, it has to originate in the Galaxy or in a new kind of radio sources (with no mid- to far-IR counterparts) or emission mechanism still to be discovered.