Stringent and Robust Constraints on the Dark Matter Annihilation Cross Section From the Region of the Galactic Center
Dan Hooper, Chris Kelso, and Farinaldo S. Queiroz

TL;DR
This paper derives new, stringent upper limits on dark matter annihilation cross sections using Fermi Telescope data from the Galactic Center, accounting for various dark matter distribution profiles and astrophysical uncertainties.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive analysis showing Galactic Center constraints are comparable or stronger than dwarf galaxy limits under realistic halo profile assumptions.
Findings
Galactic Center constraints are as strong as dwarf galaxy limits for conservative profiles.
For NFW or Einasto profiles, Galactic Center limits are generally more restrictive.
Constraints hold even with large constant-density cores in dark matter distribution.
Abstract
For any realistic halo profile, the Galactic Center is predicted to be the brightest source of gamma-rays from dark matter annihilations. Due in large part to uncertainties associated with the dark matter distribution and astrophysical backgrounds, however, the most commonly applied constraints on the dark matter annihilation cross section have been derived from other regions, such as dwarf spheroidal galaxies. In this article, we study Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope data from the direction of the inner Galaxy and derive stringent upper limits on the dark matter's annihilation cross section. Even for the very conservative case of a dark matter distribution with a significant (~kpc) constant-density core, normalized to the minimum density needed to accommodate rotation curve and microlensing measurements, we find that the Galactic Center constraint is approximately as stringent as those…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
