Comparison Study for Clonal Selection Algorithm and Genetic Algorithm
Ezgi Deniz Ulker, Sadik Ulker

TL;DR
This paper compares the performance of Clonal Selection Algorithm and Genetic Algorithm on benchmark functions, revealing that their effectiveness varies depending on the function type.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of AIS-based Clonal Selection Algorithm and Genetic Algorithms, highlighting their relative strengths on different problem types.
Findings
Performance varies with function type
Clonal Selection outperforms on some functions
Genetic Algorithm outperforms on others
Abstract
Two metaheuristic algorithms namely Artificial Immune Systems (AIS) and Genetic Algorithms are classified as computational systems inspired by theoretical immunology and genetics mechanisms. In this work we examine the comparative performances of two algorithms. A special selection algorithm, Clonal Selection Algorithm (CLONALG), which is a subset of Artificial Immune Systems, and Genetic Algorithms are tested with certain benchmark functions. It is shown that depending on type of a function Clonal Selection Algorithm and Genetic Algorithm have better performance over each other.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
