Evidence for a wide range of UV obscuration in z ~ 2 dusty galaxies from the GOODS-Herschel survey
Kyle Penner, Mark Dickinson, Alexandra Pope, Arjun Dey, Benjamin, Magnelli, Maurilio Pannella, Bruno Altieri, Herve Aussel, Veronique Buat,, Shane Bussmann, Vassilis Charmandaris, Daniela Coia, Emanuele Daddi, Helmut, Dannerbauer, David Elbaz, Ho Seong Hwang, Jeyhan Kartaltepe

TL;DR
This study investigates the causes of wide UV obscuration in z ~ 2 dusty galaxies, revealing that the diversity is mainly due to varying dust content and spatial distribution, with most galaxies showing coincident IR and UV emitting regions.
Contribution
It provides observational evidence that the UV faintness in dusty galaxies at z ~ 2 is primarily caused by differing dust obscuration levels, challenging previous assumptions about mid-IR brightness.
Findings
Most DOGs are not abnormally bright in mid-IR compared to similar galaxies.
A relation exists between IR/UV luminosity ratios and UV continuum indices.
UV obscuration differences are due to dust distribution or total dust content.
Abstract
Dusty galaxies at z ~ 2 span a wide range of relative brightness between rest-frame mid-infrared (8um) and ultraviolet wavelengths. We attempt to determine the physical mechanism responsible for this diversity. Dust-obscured galaxies (DOGs), which have rest-frame mid-IR to UV flux density ratios > 1000, might be abnormally bright in the mid-IR, perhaps due to prominent AGN and/or PAH emission, or abnormally faint in the UV. We use far-infrared data from the GOODS-Herschel survey to show that most DOGs with 10^12 L_Sun < L_IR < 10^13 L_Sun are not abnormally bright in the mid-IR when compared to other dusty galaxies with similar IR (8--1000um) luminosities. We observe a relation between the median IR to UV luminosity ratios and the median UV continuum power-law indices for these galaxies, and we find that only 24% have specific star formation rates which indicate the dominance of compact…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
