Reply to recent scepticism about the foundations of quantum cryptography
Renato Renner

TL;DR
This paper refutes recent claims that a fundamental flaw undermines quantum cryptography, clarifying that the skepticism is based on a misunderstanding of the criteria for secrecy.
Contribution
It clarifies misconceptions in recent critiques of quantum cryptography, reaffirming the robustness of its theoretical foundations.
Findings
Recent criticisms are based on a confusion between necessary and sufficient secrecy criteria
The claimed flaw does not invalidate existing security proofs in quantum cryptography
The paper defends the theoretical soundness of quantum cryptography
Abstract
In a series of recent papers, Hirota and Yuen claim to have identified a fundamental flaw in the theory underlying quantum cryptography, which would invalidate existing security proofs. In this short note, we sketch their argument and show that their conclusion is unjustified --- it originates from a confusion between necessary and sufficient criteria for secrecy.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsChaos-based Image/Signal Encryption · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Cryptographic Implementations and Security
