When is an input state always better than the others ?: universally optimal input states for statistical inference of quantum channels
Keiji Matsumoto

TL;DR
This paper investigates the existence of universally optimal input states for quantum channel inference, demonstrating their presence for certain classes of channels and measurement families, and discusses the roles of entanglement and adaptation.
Contribution
It proves the existence of universally optimal input states for specific quantum channels and measurement families, advancing understanding of optimal quantum inference strategies.
Findings
Universal optimal states exist for group covariant channels
Universal optimal states exist for unital qubit channels
Entanglement and adaptation can influence inference effectiveness
Abstract
Statistical estimation and test of unknown channels have attracted interest of many researchers. In optimizing the process of inference, an important step is optimization of the input state, which in general do depend on the kind of inference (estimation or test, etc.), on the error measure, and so on. But sometimes, there is a universally optimal input state, or an input state best for all the statistical inferences and for all the risk functions. In the paper, the existence of a universally optimal state is shown for group covariant/contravariant channels, unital qubit channels and some measurement families. To prove these results, theory of "comparison of state families" are used. We also discuss about effectiveness of entanglement and adaptation of input states.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
