On the Equivalence of Barrier Crossing, Peak-Background Split, and Local Biasing
Simone Ferraro, Kendrick M. Smith, Daniel Green, and Daniel Baumann

TL;DR
This paper proves the mathematical equivalence of three major formalisms used to predict dark matter halo clustering, unifying previously observed case-by-case agreements into a general theoretical framework.
Contribution
It provides a simple, rigorous proof demonstrating that barrier crossing, peak-background split, and local biasing are fundamentally equivalent in predicting halo clustering.
Findings
Mathematical proof of equivalence of the three formalisms
Unification of different halo clustering prediction methods
Clarification of theoretical foundations in cosmology
Abstract
Several, apparently distinct, formalisms exist in the literature for predicting the clustering of dark matter halos. It has been noticed on a case-by-case basis that the predictions of these different methods agree in specific examples, but there is no general proof that they are equivalent. In this paper, we give a simple proof of the mathematical equivalence of barrier crossing, peak-background split, and local biasing.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
