The composite theory as the explanation of Haldane's rule should be abandoned
Ren-Xue Wang

TL;DR
The paper argues that the composite theory explaining Haldane's rule is unscientific, unfalsifiable, and should be abandoned in favor of seeking a unified genetic explanation for the phenomenon.
Contribution
It critically challenges the validity of the composite theory, advocating for a move away from its multi-mechanism explanation of Haldane's rule.
Findings
The composite theory is untestable and unfalsifiable.
Haldane's rule likely has a single underlying cause.
The paper calls for abandoning the composite theory in speciation studies.
Abstract
In 1922, JBS Haldane discovered an intriguing bias of postzygotic isolation during early speciation: the heterogametic sex of F1 hybrids between closely related species or subspecies is more susceptible to sterility or inviability than the homogametic sex. This phenomenon, now known as Haldane's rule, has been repeatedly confirmed across broad taxa in diecious animals and plants. Currently, the dominant view in the field of speciation genetics believes that Haldane's rule for sterility, inviability, male heterogamety and female heterogametic belongs to different entities; and Haldane's rule in these subdivisions has different causes, which operate coincidentally and/or collectively resulting in this striking bias against the heterogametic sex in hybridization. This view, known as the composite theory, was developed after many unsuccessful quests in searching for a unitary genetic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms · Evolution and Genetic Dynamics · Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
