ALFALFA HI Data Stacking III. Comparison of environmental trends in HI gas mass fraction and specific star formation rate
Silvia Fabello, Guinevere Kauffmann, Barbara Catinella, Cheng Li,, Riccardo Giovanelli, Martha P. Haynes

TL;DR
This study compares how atomic gas content and star formation rates in galaxies depend on environment, revealing that low-mass galaxies lose atomic gas due to ram-pressure stripping in dense environments, challenging existing models.
Contribution
It provides observational evidence for ram-pressure stripping effects on low-mass galaxies and tests semi-analytic models against these environmental trends.
Findings
Atomic gas fraction declines more steeply than star formation rate in low-mass galaxies with increasing density.
Models assuming only strangulation do not match observed environmental trends.
Ram-pressure stripping likely occurs in halos above 10^13 M_sun.
Abstract
It is well known that both the star formation rate and the cold gas content of a galaxy depend on the local density out to distances of a few Megaparsecs. In this paper, we compare the environmental density dependence of the atomic gas mass fractions of nearby galaxies with the density dependence of their central and global specific star formation rates. We stack HI line spectra extracted from the Arecibo Legacy Fast ALFA survey centered on galaxies with UV imaging from GALEX and optical imaging/spectroscopy from SDSS. We use these stacked spectra to evaluate the mean atomic gas mass fraction of galaxies in bins of stellar mass and local density. For galaxies with stellar masses less than 10^10.5 M_sun, the decline in mean atomic gas mass fraction with density is stronger than the decline in mean global and central specific star formation rate. The same conclusion does not hold for more…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
