Reproducing the Stellar Mass/Halo Mass Relation in Simulated LCDM Galaxies: Theory vs Observational Estimates
Ferah Munshi, F. Governato, A. M. Brooks, C. Christensen, S. Shen, S., Loebman, B. Moster, T. Quinn, J. Wadsley

TL;DR
This study uses advanced cosmological simulations to accurately reproduce the stellar-to-halo mass relation in galaxies, aligning well with observational estimates and addressing previous discrepancies.
Contribution
It introduces improved simulation techniques and analysis methods that reconcile simulated galaxy properties with observational data, reducing systematic biases.
Findings
Simulations match observed stellar-to-halo mass ratios across a wide mass range.
Accounting for baryon loss and observational estimation methods improves accuracy.
Systematic factors like gas outflows and halo mass overestimates are crucial for realistic modeling.
Abstract
We examine the present-day total stellar-to-halo mass (SHM) ratio as a function of halo mass for a new sample of simulated field galaxies using fully cosmological, LCDM, high resolution SPH + N-Body simulations.These simulations include an explicit treatment of metal line cooling, dust and self-shielding, H2 based star formation and supernova driven gas outflows. The 18 simulated halos have masses ranging from a few times 10^8 to nearly 10^12 solar masses. At z=0 our simulated galaxies have a baryon content and morphology typical of field galaxies. Over a stellar mass range of 2.2 x 10^3 to 4.5 x 10^10 solar masses, we find extremely good agreement between the SHM ratio in simulations and the present-day predictions from the statistical Abundance Matching Technique presented in Moster et al. (2012). This improvement over past simulations is due to a number systematic factors, each…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
