
TL;DR
This paper analyzes the WMAP Cold Spot's local properties, revealing significant non-Gaussianity at large scales and suggesting cosmic texture as a plausible explanation for its anomalies.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed local statistical analysis of the Cold Spot and demonstrates that cosmic texture can account for its observed anomalies.
Findings
WMAP Cold Spot deviates from Gaussianity at ~99% significance
Local variance and skewness are larger around the Cold Spot at scales >5°
Cosmic texture explains all observed anomalies in the statistics
Abstract
We investigate the local properties of WMAP Cold Spot (CS) by defining the local statistics: mean temperature, variance, skewness and kurtosis. We find that, compared with the \emph{coldest spots} in random Gaussian simulations, WMAP CS deviates from Gaussianity at significant level. In the meanwhile, when compared with the spots at the same position in the simulated maps, the values of local variance and skewness around CS are all systematically larger in the scale of , which implies that WMAP CS is a large-scale non-Gaussian structure, rather than a combination of some small structures. This is consistent with the finding that the non-Gaussianity of CS is totally encoded in the WMAP low multipoles. Furthermore, we find that the cosmic texture can excellently explain all the anomalies in these statistics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
