A sufficient condition for first order non-definability of arrowing problems
Nerio Borges

TL;DR
This paper provides a sufficient condition, based on finite model theory and combinatorics, for when arrowing problems cannot be defined in first-order logic, advancing understanding of their logical complexity.
Contribution
It introduces a new sufficient condition for non-definability of arrowing problems in first-order logic using Hanf's Theorem and combinatorial concepts.
Findings
Identifies a sufficient condition for non-definability in first-order logic
Utilizes Hanf's Theorem and combinatorial tools like senders and determiners
Advances theoretical understanding of arrowing problems' logical limits
Abstract
We here present a sufficient condition for general arrowing problems to be non definable in first order logic, based in well known tools of finite model theory e.g. Hanf's Theorem and known concepts in finite combinatorics, like senders and determiners.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · semigroups and automata theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
