The Goldman bracket determines intersection numbers for surfaces and orbifolds
Moira Chas, Siddhartha Gadgil

TL;DR
This paper extends Goldman's Lie bracket to count intersection numbers on surfaces and orbifolds, providing topological methods to recognize geometric structures in three-manifold geometrization.
Contribution
It introduces a new Lie bracket operation that generalizes Goldman's, enabling algebraic characterization of intersection numbers for all finite type surfaces and orbifolds.
Findings
Counts self-intersection and mutual intersection numbers using the new Lie bracket.
Provides topological proofs and elementary hyperbolic geometry ideas.
Aims to aid in recognizing hyperbolic and Seifert structures in three-manifolds.
Abstract
In the mid eighties Goldman proved an embedded curve could be isotoped to not intersect a closed geodesic if and only if their Lie bracket (as defined in that work) vanished. Goldman asked for a topological proof and about extensions of the conclusion to curves with self-intersection. Turaev, in the late eighties, asked about characterizing simple closed curves algebraically, in terms of the same Lie structure. We show how the Goldman bracket answers these questions for all finite type surfaces. In fact we count self-intersection numbers and mutual intersection numbers for all finite type orientable orbifolds in terms of a new Lie bracket operation, extending Goldman's. The arguments are purely topological, or based on elementary ideas from hyperbolic geometry. These results are intended to be used to recognize hyperbolic and Seifert vertices and the gluing graph in the geometrization…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
