The Demographics of Broad Line Quasars in the Mass-Luminosity Plane II. Black Hole Mass and Eddington Ratio Functions
Brandon C. Kelly (UCSB), Yue Shen (CfA)

TL;DR
This study uses Bayesian methods to analyze the black hole mass and Eddington ratio functions of Type 1 quasars, revealing their evolution, selection effects, and implications for black hole growth and galaxy evolution.
Contribution
It introduces a Bayesian approach to estimate black hole and Eddington ratio functions from a large quasar sample, addressing selection biases and challenging the existence of a sub-Eddington boundary.
Findings
Quasars show downsizing in mass and Eddington ratio.
Maximum Eddington ratio observed is about 3.
No statistical evidence for a sub-Eddington boundary.
Abstract
We employ a flexible Bayesian technique to estimate the black hole mass and Eddington ratio functions for Type 1 (i.e., broad line) quasars from a uniformly-selected data set of ~58,000 quasars from the SDSS DR7. We find that the SDSS becomes significantly incomplete at M_{BH} < 3 x 10^8 M_{Sun} or L / L_{Edd} < 0.07, and that the number densities of Type 1 quasars continue to increase down to these limits. Both the mass and Eddington ratio functions show evidence of downsizing, with the most massive and highest Eddington ratio black holes experiencing Type 1 quasar phases first, although the Eddington ratio number densities are flat at z < 2. We estimate the maximum Eddington ratio of Type 1 quasars in the observable Universe to be L / L_{Edd} ~ 3. Consistent with our results in Paper I, we do not find statistical evidence for a so-called "sub-Eddington boundary" in the mass-luminosity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
