The Higgs mass coincidence problem: why is the higgs mass $m_H^2=m_Z m_t$?
E. Torrente-Lujan

TL;DR
This paper investigates the near-equality of the Higgs mass ratios with other fundamental particle masses, revealing potential underlying symmetries and proposing that these relations could hint at new physics beyond the Standard Model.
Contribution
It introduces phenomenological ratios involving the Higgs, W, Z, and top masses, showing their close relation to the Weinberg angle and discussing implications for underlying symmetries.
Findings
Mass ratios are close to unity within 1% precision.
Ratios can be expressed as functions of the Weinberg angle.
Relations suggest possible underlying symmetries or mechanisms.
Abstract
On the light of the recent LHC boson discovery, we present a phenomenological evaluation of the ratio , from the LHC combined value, we get () This value is close to one with a precision of the order . Similarly we evaluate the ratio . From the up-to-date mass values we get The Higgs mass is numerically close (at the level) to the . From these relations we can write any two mass ratios as a function of, exclusively, the Weinberg angle (with a precision of the order of or better): \begin{eqnarray} \frac{m_i}{m_j}&\simeq & f_{ij}(\theta_W),\quad i,j=W,Z,H,t. \end{eqnarray} For example:, .…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
