Quark condensate for various heavy flavors
Dmitri Antonov, Jose Emilio F. T. Ribeiro

TL;DR
This paper calculates the quark condensate for various heavy flavors using the world-line formalism and stochastic vacuum model, revealing significant deviations from conventional formulas especially for charm quarks.
Contribution
It introduces a novel calculation of the heavy-quark condensate considering the diminishing quark mass and non-confining interactions, highlighting limitations of traditional formulas.
Findings
The quark condensate decreases by 64% when reducing the quark mass to the inverse correlation length.
The conventional heavy-quark condensate formula is invalid for the c-quark and has up to 23% correction for the b-quark.
The condensate is independent of non-confining non-perturbative interactions under certain gluonic correlator parametrizations.
Abstract
The quark condensate is calculated within the world-line effective-action formalism, by using for the Wilson loop an ansatz provided by the stochastic vacuum model. Starting with the relation between the quark and the gluon condensates in the heavy-quark limit, we diminish the current quark mass down to the value of the inverse vacuum correlation length, finding in this way a 64%-decrease in the absolute value of the quark condensate. In particular, we find that the conventional formula for the heavy-quark condensate cannot be applied to the c-quark, and that the corrections to this formula can reach 23% even in the case of the b-quark. We also demonstrate that, for an exponential parametrization of the two-point correlation function of gluonic field strengths, the quark condensate does not depend on the non-confining non-perturbative interactions of the stochastic background Yang-Mills…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
