Lie theory and coverings of finite groups

TL;DR

This paper introduces a new algebraic structure called IP quandles as a set-theoretic analogue of Lie algebras, constructs associated groups, and explores their properties, including applications to finite groups, reflection groups, and the braid group.

Contribution

It defines IP quandles, constructs associated groups, and establishes their properties, including a covering group analogy for finite and reflection groups, and links to classical Lie theory.

Findings

G_C is a covering group of G for certain finite groups

H^1(G_C) is trivial except for a single generator in specific cases

G_C is isomorphic to B_3 for a particular IP quandle related to SL_2(Z)

Abstract

We introduce the notion of an `inverse property' (IP) quandle C which we propose as the right notion of `Lie algebra' in the category of sets. To any IP quandle we construct an associated group G_C. For a class of IP quandles which we call `locally skew' and when G_C is finite we show that the noncommutative de Rham cohomology H^1(G_C) is trivial aside from a single generator \theta that has no classical analogue. If we start with a group G then any subset C\subseteq G\setminus {e} which is ad-stable and inversion-stable naturally has the structure of an IP quandle. If C also generates G then we show that G_C \twoheadrightarrow G with central kernel, in analogy with the similar result for the simply-connected covering group of a Lie group. We prove that G_C\twoheadrightarrow G is an isomorphism for all finite crystallographic reflection groups W with C the set of reflections, and that C is locally skew precisely in the simply laced case. This implies that H^1(W)=k when W is simply laced, proving in particular a previous conjecture for S_n. We obtain similar results for the dihedral groups D_{6m}. We also consider C=Z P^1\cup Z P^1 as a locally skew IP-quandle `Lie algebra' of SL_2(Z) and show that G_C\cong B_3, the braid group on 3 strands. The map B_3\twoheadrightarrow SL_2(Z) which arises naturally as a covering map in our theory, coincides with the restriction of the universal covering map \widetilde {SL_2(R)}\to SL_2(R) to the inverse image of SL_2(Z).