Another analytic view about quantifying social forces
Marcel Ausloos

TL;DR
This paper offers an alternative physics-inspired approach to quantifying social forces using logistic and Gompertz models, analyzing temple construction as a case study to reveal different regimes and external influences.
Contribution
It introduces a novel application of logistic and Gompertz functions to quantify social forces, moving beyond Montroll's original concept and emphasizing the role of external constraints and population capacity.
Findings
Identified two distinct temple inauguration regimes in Belgium (1910-1940).
Quantified social force as a change in construction rate influenced by external constraints.
Emphasized the importance of impulse force duration within the Gompertz framework.
Abstract
Montroll had considered a Verhulst evolution approach for introducing a notion he called "social force", to describe a jump in some economic output when a new technology or product outcompetes a previous one. In fact, Montroll's adaptation of Verhulst equation is more like an economic field description than a "social force". The empirical Verhulst logistic function and the Gompertz double exponential law are used here in order to present an alternative view, within a similar mechanistic physics framework. As an example, a "social force" modifying the rate in the number of temples constructed by a religious movement, the Antoinist community, between 1910 and 1940 in Belgium is found and quantified. Practically, two temple inauguration regimes are seen to exist over different time spans, separated by a gap attributed to a specific "constraint", a taxation system, but allowing for a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
