Approximation properties for noncommutative Lp-spaces associated with lattices in Lie groups
Tim de Laat

TL;DR
This paper investigates the approximation properties of noncommutative Lp-spaces linked to lattices in Lie groups, extending known results to a broader range of p values, and demonstrating the absence of certain approximation properties.
Contribution
It proves that Sp(2,R) lacks the property of completely bounded approximation by Schur multipliers for p < 12/11 and p > 12, broadening understanding of approximation properties in noncommutative Lp-spaces.
Findings
Sp(2,R) does not have the property for p < 12/11 and p > 12
Many noncommutative Lp-spaces lack the OAP and CBAP
Extends previous results to a wider p-range
Abstract
In 2010, Lafforgue and de la Salle gave examples of noncommutative Lp-spaces without the operator space approximation property (OAP) and, hence, without the completely bounded approximation property (CBAP). To this purpose, they introduced the property of completely bounded approximation by Schur multipliers on Sp and proved that for p < 4/3 and p > 4 the groups SL(n,Z), with n \geq 3, do not have it. Since for 1 < p < \infty the property of completely bounded approximation by Schur multipliers on Sp is weaker than the approximation property of Haagerup and Kraus (AP), these groups were also the first examples of exact groups without the AP. Recently, Haagerup and the author proved that also the group Sp(2,R) does not have the AP, without using the property of completely bounded approximation by Schur multipliers on Sp. In this paper, we prove that Sp(2,R) does not have the property of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
