Comment on "On the subtleties of searching for dark matter with liquid xenon detectors"
The XENON Collaboration: E. Aprile, M. Alfonsi, K. Arisaka, F., Arneodo, C. Balan, L. Baudis, B. Bauermeister, A. Behrens, P. Beltrame, K., Bokeloh, E. Brown, G. Bruno, R. Budnik, J. M. R. Cardoso, W.-T. Chen, B., Choi, D. Cline, A. P. Colijn, H. Contreras, J. P. Cussonneau

TL;DR
This paper critically evaluates a recent claim about underestimating dark matter detection limits in liquid xenon detectors, providing a detailed analysis that challenges the original findings and clarifies methodological choices.
Contribution
The authors perform a detailed reanalysis of the previous claim, explaining why the effect was not included in their analysis and highlighting issues with the original study.
Findings
The original claim of underestimation is not confirmed by the authors.
The authors identify potential problems with the previous analysis.
Their analysis supports the robustness of existing XENON100 limits.
Abstract
In a recent manuscript (arXiv:1208.5046) Peter Sorensen claims that XENON100's upper limits on spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross sections for WIMP masses below 10 GeV "may be understated by one order of magnitude or more". Having performed a similar, though more detailed analysis prior to the submission of our new result (arXiv:1207.5988), we do not confirm these findings. We point out the rationale for not considering the described effect in our final analysis and list several potential problems with his study.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
