Planet gaps in the dust layer of 3D protoplanetary disks. II. Observability with ALMA
J.-F. Gonzalez, C. Pinte, S. T. Maddison, F. M\'enard, L. Fouchet

TL;DR
This study predicts how ALMA can observe planet-induced gaps in protoplanetary disks by incorporating detailed dust dynamics, showing that such features are detectable under optimal conditions, especially for planets of 1-5 Jupiter masses.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive method combining 3D gas+dust simulations with radiative transfer modeling to accurately predict ALMA observations of planet gaps, improving upon previous well-mixed assumptions.
Findings
Gaps created by 1 M_J planets are more visible with realistic dust dynamics.
5 M_J planets produce detectable inner disk deficits, risking misinterpretation as transition disks.
Inclination and declination have minimal impact on gap detectability.
Abstract
[Abridged] Aims: We provide predictions for ALMA observations of planet gaps that account for the specific spatial distribution of dust that results from consistent gas+dust dynamics. Methods: In a previous work, we ran full 3D, two-fluid Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) simulations of a planet embedded in a gas+dust T Tauri disk for different planet masses and grain sizes. In this work, the resulting dust distributions are passed to the Monte Carlo radiative transfer code MCFOST to construct synthetic images in the ALMA wavebands. We then use the ALMA simulator to produce images that include thermal and phase noise for a range of angular resolutions, wavelengths, and integration times, as well as for different inclinations, declinations and distances. We also produce images which assume that gas and dust are well mixed with a gas-to-dust ratio of 100 to compare with previous ALMA…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
