On sets of numbers rationally represented in a rational base number system
Victor Marsault, Jacques Sakarovitch

TL;DR
This paper proves that certain sets of numbers represented in rational base systems, which are closed under addition and form rational languages, are not finitely generated additive monoids, using a novel combinatorial property.
Contribution
It introduces the bounded left iteration property and demonstrates its relevance to rational base numeration system languages, providing new insights into their algebraic structure.
Findings
Sets closed under addition in rational base systems are not finitely generated monoids
The bounded left iteration property characterizes these languages
Rational base representations have unique combinatorial properties
Abstract
In this work, it is proved that a set of numbers closed under addition and whose representations in a rational base numeration system is a rational language is not a finitely generated additive monoid. A key to the proof is the definition of a strong combinatorial property on languages : the bounded left iteration property. It is both an unnatural property in usual formal language theory (as it contradicts any kind of pumping lemma) and an ideal fit to the languages defined through rational base number systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Logic, programming, and type systems · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
