On the general position subset selection problem
Michael S. Payne, David R. Wood

TL;DR
This paper investigates the size of large subsets with no three collinear points within larger point sets constrained by collinearity, providing new bounds that improve upon previous results especially when collinearity bounds grow with the set size.
Contribution
It establishes new lower bounds for the maximum size of subsets with no three collinear points in sets with bounded collinearity, extending and improving prior results.
Findings
For $ ext{l} \, ext{O}(\, ext{sqrt}(n))$, $f(n, ext{l}) \, ext{is} \, ext{at least} \, ext{Omega}( ext{sqrt}(rac{n}{ ext{ln} ext{l}}))$.
For $ ext{l} \, ext{O}(n^{(1- ext{epsilon})/2})$, $f(n, ext{l}) \, ext{is} \, ext{at least} \, ext{Omega}( ext{sqrt}(n ext{log}_ ext{l} n))$.
Provides bounds that improve previous results when $ ext{l}$ is not fixed.
Abstract
Let be the maximum integer such that every set of points in the plane with at most collinear contains a subset of points with no three collinear. First we prove that if then . Second we prove that if then , which implies all previously known lower bounds on and improves them when is not fixed. A more general problem is to consider subsets with at most collinear points in a point set with at most collinear. We also prove analogous results in this setting.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
