NOTE: Explaining why the Uranian satellites have equatorial prograde orbits despite the large planetary obliquity
Alessandro Morbidelli, Kleomenis Tsiganis, Konstantin Batygin,, Aurelien Crida, Rodney Gomes

TL;DR
This paper proposes a collisional tilting scenario for Uranus that explains the prograde equatorial orbits of its satellites despite the planet's large obliquity, involving a temporary ring and disk precession.
Contribution
It introduces a new collisional tilting model that accounts for the formation of Uranus's equatorial prograde satellites in the context of its obliquity history.
Findings
Proposes a collisional tilting mechanism involving a temporary ring.
Explains the formation of a thin equatorial satellite disk.
Suggests Uranus had a significant initial obliquity before tilting to 98°.
Abstract
We show that the existence of prograde equatorial satellites is consistent with a collisional tilting scenario for Uranus. In fact, if the planet was surrounded by a proto-satellite disk at the time of the tilting and a massive ring of material was temporarily placed inside the Roche radius of the planet by the collision, the proto-satellite disk would have started to precess incoherently around the equator of the planet, up to a distance greater than that of Oberon. Collisional damping would then have collapsed it into a thin equatorial disk, from which the satellites eventually formed. The fact that the orbits of the satellites are prograde requires Uranus to have had a non-negligible initial obliquity (comparable to that of Neptune) before it was finally tilted to 98 degrees.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
