Direct comparison of a Ca+ single ion clock against a Sr optical lattice clock
Kensuke Matsubara, Hidekazu Hachisu, Ying Li, Shigeo Nagano, Clayton, Locke, Asahiko Nogami, Masatoshi Kajita, Kazuhiro Hayasaka, Tetsuya Ido, and, Mizuhiko Hosokawa

TL;DR
This paper reports a precise optical frequency comparison between a calcium ion clock and a strontium optical lattice clock, achieving high accuracy and demonstrating the advantages of optical over microwave frequency measurements.
Contribution
It provides the first direct optical frequency ratio measurement between a Ca+ ion clock and a Sr lattice clock with unprecedented precision.
Findings
Frequency ratio .9576312023580499(23)
Achieved statistical uncertainty of 1-15 in 1000 seconds
Absolute frequency of 40Ca+ measured with 14 times smaller systematic uncertainty
Abstract
Optical frequency comparison of the 40Ca+ clock transition \nu_{Ca} (2S1/2-2D5/2, 729nm) against the 87Sr optical lattice clock transition \nu_{Sr}(1S0-3P0, 698nm) has resulted in a frequency ratio \nu_{Ca} / \nu_{Sr} = 0.957 631 202 358 049 9(2 3). The rapid nature of optical comparison allowed the statistical uncertainty of frequency ratio \nu_{Ca} / \nu_{Sr} to reach 1x10-15 in only 1000s and yielded a value consistent with that calculated from separate absolute frequency measurements of \nu_{Ca} using the International Atomic Time (TAI) link. The total uncertainty of the frequency ratio using optical comparison (free from microwave link uncertainties) is smaller than that obtained using absolute frequency measurement, demonstrating the advantage of optical frequency evaluation. We report the absolute frequency of ^{40}Ca+ with a systematic uncertainty 14 times smaller than our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
