Retired A Stars: The Effect of Stellar Evolution on the Mass Estimates of Subgiants
John Asher Johnson, Timothy D. Morton, Jason T. Wright

TL;DR
This study uses stellar population models to assess the accuracy of mass estimates for subgiant stars in Doppler surveys, finding that many are indeed more massive than previously questioned, supporting their role in planet occurrence studies.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that systematic errors in subgiant mass estimates are small and that many observed subgiants are genuinely massive, challenging prior claims of lower masses.
Findings
Mass estimates have negligible systematic errors.
Significant fraction of subgiants are >1.5 Msun.
Magnitude limits bias toward more massive stars.
Abstract
Doppler surveys have shown that the occurrence rate of Jupiter-mass planets appears to increase as a function of stellar mass. However, this result depends on the ability to accurately measure the masses of evolved stars. Recently, Lloyd (2011) called into question the masses of subgiant stars targeted by Doppler surveys. Lloyd argues that very few observable subgiants have masses greater than 1.5 Msun, and that most of them have masses in the range 1.0-1.2 Msun. To investigate this claim, we use Galactic stellar population models to generate an all-sky distribution of stars. We incorporate the effects that make massive subgiants less numerous, such as the initial mass function and differences in stellar evolution timescales. We find that these effects lead to negligibly small systematic errors in stellar mass estimates, in contrast to the roughly 50% errors predicted by Lloyd.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
