On the vertices of the d-dimensional Birkhoff polytope
Nathan Linial, Zur Luria

TL;DR
This paper explores the vertices of a higher-dimensional generalization of the Birkhoff polytope, revealing that Latin squares form only a small subset of the total vertices in the tristochastic array polytope.
Contribution
It establishes a lower bound on the number of vertices of the tristochastic array polytope, showing it vastly exceeds the number of Latin square vertices, and discusses related higher-dimensional polytopes.
Findings
Number of vertices is at least (L_n)^{3/2-o(1)}
Latin squares are only a small subset of all vertices
Open questions on related polytopes are presented
Abstract
Consider the Birkhoff polytope of n by n doubly-stochastic matrices. As the Birkhoff-von Neumann theorem famously states, its vertex set coincides with the set of all n by n permutation matrices. Here we seek a higher-dimensional analog of this basic fact. Namely, consider the polytope which consists of all tristochastic arrays of order n. These are n by n by n arrays with nonnegative entries in which every line sums to 1. What can be said about its vertex set? It is well-known that an order-n Latin square may be viewed as a tristochastic array where every line contains n-1 zeros and a single 1 entry. Indeed, every Latin square of order n is a vertex, but as we show, such vertices constitute only a vanishingly small part of the total number of vertices. More concretely, we show that the number of vertices is at least (L_n)^{3/2-o(1)}, where L_n is the number of order-n Latin…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsgraph theory and CDMA systems · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics · Blind Source Separation Techniques
